Thursday, September 25, 2014

Download Overload


P&G was established in 1837 offering a wide range of products from beauty, hair, grooming, health care, etc. The company has set its name to be the world biggest consumer products and advance in the industry. They also set their aim high towards a better life with goals on environment sustainability and social responsibility. Environment sustainability comprise of the conservation of resources, renewable resources and worth from waste. In addition, their social responsibility goal focuses on supporting communities, health and hygiene and comforts of home.


Company’s success is determined by the people who work and put their effort to achieve the company’s goal. However, there are also external and internal issues that involve during the business process. In this example, we will look at the internal issue that comes from the employees. The issue arise from the overused of social technology within the company. Newspaper article by Stampler (2012) reported that P&G employees accessed up to 50,000 YouTube videos download and watching them during work hours. In addition, these access included to Pandora, a music library that enable to listen to music after downloading the music to the device. Quickly, we are able to identify the concern of Enterprise 2.0 that affect productivity. These actions have brought the company to a loss since the productivity of employees decrease because the above actions didn’t have any contribution to job description. It also brought an issue in regards to being ethical, because an ethical worker should be able to use technology appropriately (Yeaman, 2004). Moreover, with the increase of Internet access that means that company spend more money for Internet bandwidth. As quoted by Business Insider Australia (2012), the company could be paying up to $15M for Internet consumption. And of course, looking from the business perspective it is a loss since it doesn’t involve any work activity.

What the company could do?

P&G need to take action by either blocking or creating limitation on the access to social media from company’s network. However, blocking is a critical action because the company need to take into consideration the use of social technology for other purpose within the company. P&G need to recognise that not all access to social technology doesn’t involve work activity. There are still some departments that require the access to social technology for their part of the job. Therefore, creating limitation on some area is preferable.



Reference:
Procter and Gamble. (2014). Making Everyday Life Better. Retrieved from http://www.pg.com/en_US/sustainability/overview/index.shtml
Stampler, L. (2004). Procter and Gamble bans staff from using netflix and pandora. Business Insider Australia. Retrived from http://www.businessinsider.com.au/procter-and-gamble-bans-netflix-and-pandora-2012-4

Yeaman, A. R. J. (2004). The misuse of technology. TechTrends, 48(5), 14-16,83. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/874024715?accountid=13380

5 comments:

  1. I enjoyed your blog!
    I wrote a blog for this company for week 4 activity. If you are interested in, just visit my blog:)
    I did not know this information, it is really surprised. I think this company must invest to mange employees computers. For example, P and G import surveillance network software. I think if you put URL link for this company or in text references, it is better and helpful.

    This is my blog:
    http://aisakaguchi.blogspot.com.au/2014_09_01_archive.html
    If you have time, please read my blog!!
    Please feel free to comment as well.
    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey really liked reading your blog good work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, i hope my post is understandable.:)

      Delete
  3. Hey nice post!

    It seems crazy that the company would not block YouTube, it's not as if this is a social tool that is productive or helpful to the company. In comparison if resources were being used on a platform like wordpress, yammer or even Facebook the company might think about limiting usage rather than blocking.

    Renee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I agree. since social media such as Facebook, wordpress and yammer are use mostly to communicate with customers. whereas Youtube is only use for browsing videos. Unless if they are using it for advertising purposes.But i do think that create limitation to internet usage would be better for the company.

      Delete